← Teams

LOTC-Wellman/White

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.81 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Morgan Cowling
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #1 Singles 15% · published 4
—
Abby van Amerongen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Aleina Tanabe
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Nina Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.59
Ariana White
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.47
Ann Arp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.28
Ann Lasocki
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-03-31Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesAbby van Amerongen / Ariana White vs Cassia Carpio / Jennifer Tran6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJuliet Hanson / Nina Hanson vs Tarynn Berkman / Sammy Bui6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAnn Lasocki vs Ren Toshié Miura6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaie Wellman / Morgan Cowling vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Heather Dudley6-1, 6-1
2024-03-30Lost 1–3
W#1 SinglesAleina Tanabe vs Janna McDougall6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnn Arp / Kaie Wellman vs Aleli Siruno / Seungja Shin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Lasocki vs Yvonne Qiu6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Nina Hanson vs Diane Pittmon / Laura Rundle6-1, 6-3
2024-03-22Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAbby van Amerongen / Ariana White vs Starlyn Corley / Maria Kosmetatos6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAleina Tanabe vs Karen Harlow6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesErin Casey / Kaie Wellman vs Kate Leatherbarrow / Kristi Vargas6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnn Lasocki / Rebecca Roberts vs Kathleen Budnick / Jennifer Richman6-3, 6-3
2024-03-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAleina Tanabe / Kathryn Stockbower vs Whitney Palfreyman / Pamela Hummelt7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAbby van Amerongen / Ariana White vs Sally Lovett / Jeanette Thomas7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaie Wellman / Erin Casey vs Michelle Doherty / Michelle Posey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-18Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesAbby van Amerongen / Ariana White vs Allison Schenk / Toni Kidd5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Lasocki vs Mary Hlady6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJuliet Hanson / Nina Hanson vs Cathy Valentine / Linda Graham6-3, 7-5
2024-02-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAbby van Amerongen / Morgan Cowling vs Rie Sasakawa / Kelly Mohr6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAleina Tanabe vs Ashley Schneider4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Arp / Erin Casey vs Julie Hansen / Donna Kennish6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-01-28Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesMorgan Cowling vs Libby North6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesErin Casey / Nina Hanson vs Rebecca Jones / Cathy Porter6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-01-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKathryn Stockbower / Morgan Cowling vs ANN MILLER / Jeanette Thomas1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnn Lasocki vs Christina McMenamin6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAbby van Amerongen / Ariana White vs Kim Hasle / Michelle Doherty6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Morgan Cowling
101W–63L career
1%99%0%
3.75
4
Abby van Amerongen
20W–12L career
not enough data
—
4
Aleina Tanabe
20W–19L career
not enough data
—
4
Nina Hanson
110W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.69
4
Ariana White
177W–86L career
14%86%0%
3.59
3.5
Ann Arp
39W–27L career
0%80%20%
3.47
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Ann Lasocki
22W–36L career
0%99%1%
3.28

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.