Teams

KRA Hauk

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs RCC SamuelsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Lisa Voeks vs Connie Jervey / Pam Walsh2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Hauk / Emily Edens vs Julie Stivers / Christine Finnegan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Geri Samuels1-6, 1-6
2022-06-10vs ACAC RiddleWon 20
W#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Grace Kim6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Daniel / Daniela Otto vs Kimberly Giancaspro / Andrea Schuetzinger6-0, 6-3
2022-06-07vs WOCC FullerWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Edens / Katie Gerecke vs Sharon Fuller / Maya Wilder4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Dickinson / Rebecca Morgan vs Julia Calamita / Julie Eddins6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs CCV DeLaceyWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Edens / Katie Gerecke vs Kate Beckler / Laura West Hatcher6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Kerry DeLacey1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Dickinson / Emily Gravitt vs Donna Butler / Anne Robertson Starke3-6, 3-6
2022-06-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Michele Smith vs Elizabeth Fraizer / Karen Williamson1-6, 2-6
2022-05-31vs Burkwood RowLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeannette Reiter / Lauren Hauk vs Melissa Stewart / Lindsey O'Kane6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Smith / Sarah Dickinson vs Nancy Row / Robin Booth4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Ann Maitland-Lewis4-6, 3-6
2022-05-27vs Westwood AnthonyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Terrell / Daniela Otto vs Kelly Berry / Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka6-3, 6-0
2022-05-20vs TDC WymanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Hauk / Daniela Otto vs Nicole Wyman / Kelley Schmidt6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Denise Terrell vs Patrice Shupack / Linda Battle4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Edens
published 4.5
4.22
Lauren Hauk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Denise Terrell
published 4
3.88
Emily Gravitt
published 4
3.77
Rebecca Morgan
published
3.77
Sarah Dickinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Daniela Otto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Katie Gerecke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Sarah Nicholas
published
3.47
Jeannette Reiter
published
3.45
Charlotte Shirey
published 3.5
3.38
Meghan Pearsall
published
3.31
Katy Hottinger
published
Annie Gushman
published 3.5
3.24
Sara Winterhoff
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.19
Wendy Daniel
published
Lisa Voeks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Hauk + Sarah Dickinson6554% gamesnot enough data
Katie Gerecke + Sarah Dickinson4445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Edens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Lauren Hauk
67W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4
Denise Terrell
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Emily Gravitt
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Rebecca Morgan
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Sarah Dickinson
47W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Daniela Otto
117W–203L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Katie Gerecke
110W–125L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
Sarah Nicholas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jeannette Reiter
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Charlotte Shirey
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Meghan Pearsall
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.38
Katy Hottinger
25W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Annie Gushman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Winterhoff
99W–86L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Wendy Daniel
15W–18L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lisa Voeks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.