Teams

BW Mayo/Whitley(55s 4.0W SP

2025 Neuse River Adult 55 & Over League · 4.0 Women 55 & over

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-29vs CC-Tormey 55s 4.0W SPWon 20
W#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Sangita Tewari vs Marie Tingle / Beth Metzler6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Mayo / Suzan Martin vs Sue Dunlap / Joy Cooper6-1, 6-0
2025-04-15vs OP-Watson NETTERS 55s 4.0W SPWon 21
W#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Sangita Tewari vs Sherry Hambright / Doris Smith6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichele Mayo / Jarma Khoury vs Ruby Williams / Mary Ringwalt7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Cox / Cynthia Streibich vs Cheryl Watson / Ann Henderson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-25vs OP-Watson NETTERS 55s 4.0W SPLost 12
W#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Jarma Khoury vs Kim Alford / Lynn Easley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Mayo / Leslie Rogers vs Mary Ringwalt / Ruby Williams3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Whitley / Diana Cox vs Ann Henderson / Sherry Hambright1-6, 4-6
2025-03-11vs GR-Taylor Sister Squad 55s 4.0W SPLost 12
L#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Michele Mayo vs Ina Jones / Sherry Smith4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Streibich / Lorinda Parker vs Cynthia Jones / Sheryletta Lacewell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSuzan Martin / Sharon Christian vs Carol Taylor / Catherine Land6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-04vs OP-Watson NETTERS 55s 4.0W SPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Suzan Martin vs Merry Katherine Glover / Stephanie Garner4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLeslie Rogers / Diana Cox vs Cheryl Watson / Ann Henderson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Whitley / Feng-Ling Wu vs Ruby Williams / Denise Wells1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Sangita Tewari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Cynthia Streibich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Missy Barrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Feng-Ling Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Diana Cox
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Michele Mayo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Sharon Christian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Suzan Martin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Leslie Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Lorinda Parker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
Kelly Whitley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Jarma Khoury
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missy Barrow + Sangita Tewari9074% games+20.1% vs expected
Sharon Christian + Kelly Whitley6164% games+3.0% vs expected
Missy Barrow + Suzan Martin2347% gamesnot enough data
Missy Barrow + Michele Mayo3252% gamesnot enough data
Missy Barrow + Kelly Whitley314 matchesnot enough data
Diana Cox + Kelly Whitley134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Christian + Lorinda Parker213 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Christian + Michele Mayo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sangita Tewari
17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Cynthia Streibich
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Missy Barrow
27W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
Feng-Ling Wu
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Diana Cox
8W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Michele Mayo
22W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Sharon Christian
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Suzan Martin
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Leslie Rogers
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Lorinda Parker
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Kelly Whitley
25W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Jarma Khoury
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.