Teams

WW-Payne

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-14vs MAC-TalamoLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaren Payne / Kirk Evans vs Lidia Cousins / Ken Hammond2-6, 5-7
2021-03-06vs HERM-HofferLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Nilson / Caren Payne vs Kevin Miller / Addie Miller3-6, 1-6
2021-02-27vs ACAC-FieldsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaren Payne / Mark Wickersham vs William Fields / Jenna DeLigio3-6, 0-6
2021-02-21vs MAC-MooreWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Nilson / Caren Payne vs Kim Boys / Donna Moore6-1, 6-2
2021-01-16vs SAL-SteinourWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaren Payne / Kirk Evans vs Scott Gordon / Beth Farnsworth7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2021-01-10vs BURK-StewartLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaren Payne / Kirk Evans vs Steve Oliver / Teresa Landes-Shuler6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kimberly Varney
published
3.38
Kirby Fields
published
3.31
George Brickley
published 3.5
3.29
Mark Wickersham
published
3.27
Cherie Warfield
published 3.5
3.26
Harry Turton
published 3.5
Holley Nilson
published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth West
published 3.5
3.24
Brad Rodgers
published 3.5
3.19
Patricia Bishop
published
3.12
Robert Nilson
published
2.99
Caren Payne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Janet Livick
published
Louise O'Connor
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Varney
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Kirby Fields
11W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
George Brickley
13W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Mark Wickersham
13W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Cherie Warfield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Harry Turton
16W–26L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Holley Nilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth West
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brad Rodgers
2W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Patricia Bishop
9W–19L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Robert Nilson
12W–19L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–68L career · 9 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
Janet Livick
6W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Louise O'Connor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.