Teams

VAC-Caoile

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Debra Blackwell-Schrag
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Angela Keck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results6 ties
2025-08-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Blackwell-Schrag / David Gordon vs Candace Hines / Douglas Bell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAngela Keck / David Gordon vs Matthew Harris / Theresa Smith6-3, 6-2
2025-07-13Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSean Finn / Angela Keck vs Oliver Vicente / Colleen Sharkey7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Gordon / Debra Blackwell-Schrag vs Kim Hood / Travis Westfall6-1, 7-5
2025-06-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAngela Keck / David Gordon vs Kristin Gallagher / David Campana6-4, 6-2
2025-06-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesKurt Bethman / Debra Blackwell-Schrag vs Tami Davis / Corey West6-3, 7-6
2025-05-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSean Finn / Debra Blackwell-Schrag vs Tami Davis / Oliver Vicente6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Debra Blackwell-Schrag
143W–98L career
0%99%1%
3.80
4
Angela Keck
80W–104L career
0%99%0%
3.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.