Teams

LJLA-Lands/NMP

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 6.5 Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesSeung Min Hyun / William Cune vs Sly Riccardelli / Stephen Phillips7-5, 6-1
2024-09-18vs LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton 40+ 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesSeung Min Hyun / William Cune vs Walter Rodriguez / Shabari Kandasami6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTodd Krieg / Keith MacVean vs Sam Yin / John Lesher3-6, 3-6
2024-09-11vs LBKI-King/PeninsulaLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Cune / Keith MacVean vs Jim Beam / Mark Mizicko1-6, 4-6
2024-09-04vs LBWA-Ward/River Run 40+ 6.5 WedWon 10
W#1 DoublesSeung Min Hyun / William Cune vs Newell Daly / Todd Simmel7-5, 6-2
2024-08-28vs LJFE-Fernandez/CSDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Krieg / Keith MacVean vs Andres Rendon / Andrew Howland0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Cune / Francis Bolger vs Antony Jayapal / Gary Jones2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Fahmey / William Cune vs Brian Stiffler / James Laurenson3-6, 2-6
2024-08-14vs LDFU-Fuerst/JettonLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Fahmey / William Cune vs Steven Porter / David Fuerst4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Seung Min Hyun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
William Cune
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.10
Kyle Payne
published
3.04
Todd Krieg
published
3.04
Jonathan Hole
published
2.77
Francis Bolger
published 3
2.74
Greg Razewski
published 3
2.58
Keith MacVean
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Cune + Seung Min Hyun14262% games+1.5% vs expected
Jonathan Hole + Todd Krieg0624% games−12.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Seung Min Hyun
38W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3
William Cune
61W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.12
Kyle Payne
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Todd Krieg
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jonathan Hole
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Francis Bolger
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Greg Razewski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Keith MacVean
34W–89L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.