Teams

KGreen-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-29vs KPollak-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmber Bowden vs Button Hall6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJennifer Kuzma vs Anna Brown7-6, 6-3
2026-06-22vs HRoss-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesKeshia Green vs Justyne Ross5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAmber Bowden vs Tiffany Langino0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJennifer Kuzma vs Maya Hahn1-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs MLong-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Chan vs Jill Akiyama4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAmber Bowden vs Dallas Knight3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-08vs KPollak-DURWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Kuzma vs Amber Cagle4-3
W#2 SinglesAmber Bowden vs Kathryn Pollak6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Miho Ogura4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-01vs HRoss-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesSarah Motsinger vs Sindhu Shivaji3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Chan vs Valerie Acre1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAmber Bowden vs Tiffany Langino5-7, 2-6
2026-05-18vs MLong-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmber Bowden vs Dallas Knight0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Kuzma vs Lina Habib4-6, 5-7
2026-05-11vs KPollak-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Chan vs Amber Cagle3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Anna Brown7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-04vs HRoss-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesKeshia Green vs Kelsey Kowalski1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesShelly Guo vs Chace Ogle1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Sarah Motsinger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.68
Elizabeth Chan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Amber Bowden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Keshia Green
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.28
Shelly Guo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Motsinger
38W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Elizabeth Chan
34W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Amber Bowden
23W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Keshia Green
27W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Shelly Guo
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.