Teams

NJ RED

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 9.5 - ITA

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-20vs WP REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesShani Botha / Keaton Howe vs Paul Suyumov / Hailey Suyumov2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Talia Cioth vs Chris Birschbach / Stephanie Skarwecki6-7, 3-6
2023-08-13vs CP BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesBen Gottenberg / Talia Cioth vs Mateo Barroetavena / Erica Bramlet6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKeaton Howe / Shea Donahue vs Matthew Hooper / Greer MacKie2-6, 3-6
2023-08-06vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesKeaton Howe / Sarah Schupp vs Nick Salazar / Kimberly Greason3-6, 2-6
2023-07-30vs RRTC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesKeaton Howe / Kathleen Kuosman vs Christopher Deboer / Amanda Wootton2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Sarah Schupp vs Jose Amador / Kendra Lord3-6, 2-6
2023-07-23vs DTC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesTalia Cioth / Brandon Jacquez vs Catherine Safieddine / Aaron Bowlds7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-09vs DTC PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Sarah Schupp vs Scott Bice / Kristen Tourangeau7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Brandon Jacquez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Talia Cioth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Troy Wilson
published
4.21
Trevor Updegraff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Sarah Schupp
published
4.16
Keaton Howe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Kathleen Kuosman
published
Shani Botha
published
Tucker Humphrey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Talia Cioth + Keaton Howe4453% gamesnot enough data
Talia Cioth + Brandon Jacquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brandon Jacquez
63W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Talia Cioth
74W–36L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
Troy Wilson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Trevor Updegraff
45W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
Sarah Schupp
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Keaton Howe
35W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
Kathleen Kuosman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shani Botha
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tucker Humphrey
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.