Teams

Pleasants

2024 Yadkin Valley Racquets and Jackets · Women 3.0 - Sunday Afternoon

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-02vs Team JenningsLost 02
L#1 DoublesWhitney Newell / Emily Wilson vs Natalie Jennings / Katie Allen4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeana Brown / Ashley Peters vs Alice Day Clark / Nikki Francis2-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs GeorgitisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVirginia Pleasants / Whitney Newell vs Alyssa Howards / Sarah Blackwell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Ralston / Emily Wilson vs Inge Smith / Deana Georgitis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-25vs Team HawleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesVirginia Pleasants / Ashley Peters vs Temple Steele / Maureen Geraghty6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBetsey Hutton / Whitney Newell vs Janine Hawley Girard / Araya Puwanant6-1, 6-3
2024-12-08vs GeorgitisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeana Brown / Emily Wilson vs Melanie Brost / Christina Soriano7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetsey Hutton / Virginia Pleasants vs Sarah Blackwell / Deana Georgitis6-2, 6-2
2024-11-24vs Team HawleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesVirginia Pleasants / Kathryn Felts vs Araya Puwanant / Karen Lehman7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeana Brown / Whitney Newell vs Temple Steele / Casey Henderson6-3, 6-2
2024-11-10vs Coordinator TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesWhitney Newell / Betsey Hutton vs Melissa Marlowe / Mary Ayscue6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Ralston / Ashley Peters vs Hannah Hsu / Monica Medina-Murphy6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 - Sunday Afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Ashley Peters
published 3.5
2.85
Betsey Hutton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Whitney Newell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Kathryn Felts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Virginia Pleasants
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Cathy Ralston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Leana Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsey Hutton + Whitney Newell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Peters
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3
Betsey Hutton
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Whitney Newell
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Kathryn Felts
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Virginia Pleasants
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Cathy Ralston
28W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Leana Brown
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.