Teams

Davis' Divas

2023 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel 55 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-01vs Purple PowerWon 10
W#2 DoublesDale Clark / Erika Cadori vs Ettie Collins / Janette O Logan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-24vs HillLost 01
L#2 DoublesErika Cadori / Sheila Norman vs Margarete Wolk / Mary Corbiere1-6, 4-6
2023-05-15vs Purple PowerWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Arnold / Erika Cadori vs Donnita McMillan / Cynthia Wofford6-4, 6-4
2023-04-19vs Lady TigersLost 01
L#3 DoublesErika Cadori / Bobbi Farquhar vs Cyndi Casey / Martha van Cleve3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Dale Clark
published 3.5
3.43
Lynne Powell
published
3.42
Cynthia Rapp
published 3.5
3.20
Cindy Keegan
published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Jacobson
published 3.5
3.02
Mary Arnold
published
2.94
Jennifer Mason
published
2.71
Erika Cadori
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Shelley Sturtz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Jacobson + Dale Clark6650% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dale Clark
19W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Lynne Powell
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Cynthia Rapp
36W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Cindy Keegan
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elizabeth Jacobson
29W–30L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Mary Arnold
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jennifer Mason
1W–16L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Erika Cadori
33W–26L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.