Teams

MO - Little/Snead

2023 Adult 18 & Over Women Winter Day - Mobile · 2.5 Women Winter Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Winter Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Katie Chapman
published
Brooke Pilot
published 3.5
3.08
Lisa Coumanis
published
2.98
Marilenis Mcdonald
published
2.92
Leigh Segrest
published
2.90
Mary Frances Smith
published
2.75
Beth Britt
published 3
2.69
Leslie Merritt
published
2.66
Mary Tanner Sanders
published
2.62
Paige Little
published
2.60
Leslie Ann Snead
published
2.24
Jordan McLeod
published
2.20
Codi Dearing
published 2.5
2.05
Ginnie Pilcher
published
Kim Gross
published
Krista Nebrig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan McLeod + Codi Dearing2445% games−0.4% vs expected
Marilenis Mcdonald + Lisa Coumanis134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Frances Smith + Beth Britt303 matchesnot enough data
Krista Nebrig + Beth Britt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Chapman
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Brooke Pilot
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Coumanis
29W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
Marilenis Mcdonald
30W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Leigh Segrest
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Mary Frances Smith
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Beth Britt
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Leslie Merritt
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Mary Tanner Sanders
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Paige Little
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.62
Leslie Ann Snead
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jordan McLeod
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Codi Dearing
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
Ginnie Pilcher
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kim Gross
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Krista Nebrig
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.