Teams

Team 1 Mojos

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 4.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-05vs Team 6 Belle HavenLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Denemark / David Stepherson vs Greg Woodford / John O'Dwyer5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-15vs Team 2 Spin DoctorsLost 02
L#2 DoublesThomas Berray / David Stepherson vs Todd Campbell / Rohan Raikar3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichel Ellert-Beck / Cosby Hunt vs Changfu Xiao / Matt Morgan2-6, 3-6
2025-02-01vs Team 6 Belle HavenWon 20
W#1 DoublesLuis Giraldo / John Denemark vs John O'Dwyer / Matt Breslin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJose Torres / Michel Ellert-Beck vs Michael Caudill / Scott Darling6-2, 6-2
2025-01-22vs Team 3 Pirates Over 40Won 20
W#2 DoublesCosby Hunt / David Stepherson vs Jagannath Chakravarty / Jean Ali Tavassoli6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDan Wilmot / Thomas Berray vs Michael Healy / George Gold6-2, 6-0
2025-01-04vs Team 2 Spin DoctorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Berray / Dan Wilmot vs Todd Campbell / Alfredo Perez1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Luis Giraldo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chad Wolf
published 4.5
4.18
David Stepherson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
John Denemark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Cosby Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Farooq Jaffrey
published
3.88
Thomas Berray
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jason Wall
published
Michel Ellert-Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Stern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Berray + David Stepherson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Giraldo
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Chad Wolf
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Stepherson
77W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
John Denemark
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Cosby Hunt
95W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Farooq Jaffrey
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Thomas Berray
80W–91L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.88
Jason Wall
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michel Ellert-Beck
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Stern
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.