Teams

KY/LOU/DALTON

2026 USTA FALL 40 & OVER LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Elizabeth Kaebnick
published
3.42
Tammy Pollock
published
3.40
Alice Dant
published 3.5
3.40
Theresa Alexander
published
3.23
Priscilla Finley
published
3.17
Thuy Murphy
published
3.11
Mashelle Kiggins
published
3.09
Mary Conder
published
3.02
Kimberly Polter
published
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
published
2.86
2.50
Lindagarde Dalton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Alexander + Elizabeth Kaebnick4559% games+8.0% vs expected
Tammy Pollock + Mashelle Kiggins9747% games+0.9% vs expected
Thuy Murphy + Christine Montgomery3251% games−1.8% vs expected
Thuy Murphy + Mechelle Kaufman4457% games−6.9% vs expected
Lindagarde Dalton + Kimberly Polter033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Conder + Mechelle Kaufman213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Polter + Christine Montgomery123 matchesnot enough data
Mechelle Kaufman + Mashelle Kiggins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Kaebnick
14W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Tammy Pollock
41W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Alice Dant
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Theresa Alexander
16W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Priscilla Finley
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Thuy Murphy
20W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Mashelle Kiggins
23W–28L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Mary Conder
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kimberly Polter
9W–19L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
38W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Christine Montgomery
30W–40L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Lindagarde Dalton
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.