Teams

WRC - De Andreis

2022 Broward Mixed Mombo 18 & Over · 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-14vs Broward Midtown - PradoLost 02
L#2 DoublesAlan Matheus / Raiza Matheus vs Rene Rivera / Patricia Velez3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFranco de Andreis / Marianne Rivas vs Ronald Coletto / Rosana Fernandez0-6, 3-6
2022-12-09vs Veltri - YonghongWon 20
W#1 DoublesSimon Palacios / Raiza Matheus vs Alejandro Gonzalez / Gema de Dios6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNoelia Diaz / Junior Carrasquero vs Yonghong Chen / Leonardo Concha6-3, 7-6
2022-12-02vs Wrc - PerillaLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaiza Matheus / Alan Matheus vs Danilo Gonzalez / Itala Ream6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFranco de Andreis / Marianne Rivas vs Roberto Gentile / Maria Montoto3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Kattan / Lissette Loddo vs Roberto Nieves / Catherine Land6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-25vs Veltri - YonghongWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarianne Rivas / Franco de Andreis vs Federico Molinari / Ana Pastorino6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJunior Carrasquero / Noelia Diaz vs Myra Perkins / Pavel Vayshelboym6-3, 6-1
2022-11-11vs Sunrise - MarcelinLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniela Hernandez / Junior Carrasquero vs Alfredo Tellez / Mayte Ruano0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFranco de Andreis / Marianne Rivas vs Gregory Joseph / Samie Lesperance4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRaiza Matheus / Alan Matheus vs Andres Larrea / Paulette Janice Snagg6-4, 6-3
2022-10-28vs Wrc - PerillaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJorge J Espejo Sigler / Noelia Diaz vs Augusto Alizo / Catherine Land6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLissette Loddo / Simon Palacios vs Lidia Luz / Roberto Nieves6-3, 6-1
2022-10-21vs Midtown - BarronSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRaiza Matheus / Alan Matheus vs Antoine Gendre / Rossitza Anguelova-Szabo6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarianne Rivas / Franco de Andreis vs MARIANA SILVA / Adrian Perez6-7, 6-7
2022-10-14vs Ltc - Gaela/LevineWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarianne Rivas / Jorge Balsamo vs CHRISTOPHE PETIT / Edith Schmidt6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLissette Loddo / Michael Kattan vs Axel Sanchez / Frances Cubano6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Alan Matheus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
3.99
Simon Palacios
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.95
Lissette Loddo
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.94
3.88
Noelia Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Michael Kattan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Franco de Andreis
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.79
Marianne Rivas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.70
Jorge Balsamo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Raiza Matheus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.60
3.35
Junior Carrasquero
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Maria Lanza
published
Roberto Palma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lissette Loddo + Michael Kattan10752% games+4.3% vs expected
Jorge Balsamo + Marianne Rivas7652% games−0.2% vs expected
Franco de Andreis + Daniela Hernandez1539% games−7.5% vs expected
Marianne Rivas + Franco de Andreis7553% gamesnot enough data
Simon Palacios + Noelia Diaz5356% gamesnot enough data
Simon Palacios + Marianne Rivas4351% gamesnot enough data
Raiza Matheus + Alan Matheus4162% gamesnot enough data
Marianne Rivas + Michael Kattan5072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alan Matheus
122W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
Jorge J Espejo Sigler
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4
Simon Palacios
263W–141L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Lissette Loddo
194W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Daniela Hernandez
32W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Noelia Diaz
170W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Michael Kattan
212W–110L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Franco de Andreis
237W–172L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Marianne Rivas
324W–152L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Jorge Balsamo
180W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Raiza Matheus
156W–112L career · 10 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Alberto de la Rosa
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Junior Carrasquero
110W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Maria Lanza
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Roberto Palma
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.