Teams

Jo.VanDeWater18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-08vs Ga.Jimenez18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Lloyd / John VanDeWater vs David Rowe / Pete Vammino2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-06vs Ri.McClenny18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Scott Schwartz vs Patrick Newsome / Stephen Holmes4-6, 3-6
2023-10-01vs Br.Eckles18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmrit Narula / Jeff Plemmons vs Jermaine Byrd / Kwame Owens3-6, 3-6
2023-09-10vs Mi.Ladd18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Jeff Plemmons vs Bruce Mildwurf / EJ Mildwurf3-5
L#3 DoublesAmrit Narula / Charles Whitehorne vs Michael Ladd / Jack Baur6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-27vs St.Wingo18C8.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Presser / Amrit Narula vs Dat Pham / Andrew Pham2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-20vs Gr.Raschke18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Presser / John VanDeWater vs Adam Troxell / Lawrence Brock2-6, 2-6
2023-08-13vs An.Davis18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesTakayuki Yamato / John VanDeWater vs James Miron / Russell Riley1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesScott Schwartz / Amrit Narula vs Ryan Walter / Richard Rambo5-7, 6-7
2023-08-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Scott Schwartz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Amrit Narula
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
3.84
Mark Combs
published
Dennis Tran
published 4
3.72
Brady Allen
published 4
3.69
John VanDeWater
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Takayuki Yamato
published
3.47
Jeff Plemmons
published
Jarod Styres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amrit Narula + Charles Whitehorne3255% games+0.2% vs expected
John VanDeWater + Amrit Narula213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amrit Narula
148W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Charles Whitehorne
39W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Mark Combs
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Dennis Tran
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Brady Allen
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
4
John VanDeWater
149W–114L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.69
Takayuki Yamato
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jeff Plemmons
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jarod Styres
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.