Teams

Harbour Ridge - Whittington

2024 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-26vs Boulevard - KushnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Coates / Marilyn Horvit vs Sue Davis / Wendy Orthober6-3, 7-6
2024-11-19vs IRMSL/Cummings/50&over7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarilyn Horvit / Lori Coates vs Sandy Palma / Pamela Yannotta6-4, 6-2
2024-11-17vs NRS - AlbrechtLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrigite Babine / Lori Coates vs Grace Pillari / Darla Cederberg0-6, 6-7
2024-11-10vs Vero Club Tennis - GoldWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Whittington / Lori Coates vs Joan Dobravsky / Eliot Foote6-1, 6-2
2024-10-22vs Boulevard - KushnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Marolf / Susan Yeager vs Wendy Orthober / Rachael McLaurin1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristianne Coover / Brigite Babine vs Marta Gannon / Sara Lloyd7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Novak / Susan Whittington vs Sherri Glaab / Melissa Dean3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christianne Coover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Janet Novak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Judy Zanchi
published
3.40
Brigite Babine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Joyce Costopoulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Coates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marilyn Horvit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Pribble
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Susan Whittington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Yeager
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tricia Marolf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Whittington + Brigite Babine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christianne Coover
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Janet Novak
30W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.62
Judy Zanchi
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Brigite Babine
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Joyce Costopoulos
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Coates
202W–160L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marilyn Horvit
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Pribble
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Whittington
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Yeager
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tricia Marolf
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.