Teams

CSRC ANDERSON

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-07vs MEMPK MCFARLANDLost 02
L#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Kelly Cavanaugh vs Eta Santoro / Amanda Irons6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJenny McCabe / Marian Nelson vs Carol Presicci / Kirsten Matheson6-7
2025-09-04vs PBTC MITCHELLWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenny McCabe / Jennifer Charlier Cox vs Judy Mitchell / Paula Henson6-2, 6-3
2025-08-21vs PBTC MITCHELLLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Cavanaugh / Eliza Montoya vs Emily Vidmar / Lynette di Stasio3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarian Nelson / Jennifer Charlier Cox vs Geepress Corpuz / Jessica Kepler7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-14vs CCOC COONSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlohalani Kaleo / Vincenta van Every vs Maura Houston / Mary Simmons6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJenny McCabe / Jennifer Charlier Cox vs Kolsie Coleman / Blair Carter6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-07vs MEMPK MCFARLANDWon 21
W#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Marian Nelson vs Katherine Crumpton / Kirsten Matheson7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesVincenta van Every vs Kit McFarland6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarrie Gilmore / Jennifer Charlier Cox vs Erin Contreras / Carol Presicci4-6, 5-7
2025-07-24vs CCOC COONSWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Cavanaugh / Alohalani Kaleo vs Mary Vanryzin / Maura Houston2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Charlier Cox vs Colleen Cameron7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJenny McCabe / Eliza Montoya vs Kolsie Coleman / Joy Farmer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kelly Cavanaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Alohalani Kaleo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Vincenta van Every
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Eliza Montoya
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Carrie Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Jennifer Charlier Cox
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.82
Jenny McCabe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Cavanaugh + Alohalani Kaleo26961% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Cavanaugh
78W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Alohalani Kaleo
129W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
Vincenta van Every
41W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Eliza Montoya
51W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carrie Gilmore
19W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jennifer Charlier Cox
84W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.85
Jenny McCabe
16W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.