Teams

5*EMcElligott-SVC

2024 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women Wknd

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Lisa Simmons vs Cindy Bohlin / Leslie Jackson6-1, 6-4
2024-07-14vs 9*NDolan-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Laura Caldwell vs Nicole Dolan / Lisa Hsu4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-07vs 7*LKulp-BPWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Misa / Erika Curry vs Jennifer Magee / Karen Schmitz6-0, 6-2
2024-06-16vs 6*MLong-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna Misa / Caroline Patzer vs Megan Chiles / Lisa Montague2-6, 2-6
2024-06-09vs 3*LDubois-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Erin McElligott vs Christina Pipkin / Caroline Perkinson6-1, 6-1
2024-05-26vs 2*LBible-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Coward / Donna Misa vs Yaas Bigdeli / Janet Ranheim6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Caroline Patzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Coward
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Erin McElligott
published
3.15
Laura Caldwell
published
3.12
Dawn Kleinman
published 3
3.08
Debbie Castiller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Donna Misa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Stacy Brehm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Laura Malahias
published
2.35
Chrissy King
published 2.5
Elizabeth Arnold
published
Melinda Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Patzer + Stacy Brehm61842% games−1.7% vs expected
Donna Misa + Debbie Castiller2346% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Patzer
142W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Erin McElligott
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Laura Caldwell
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Dawn Kleinman
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Debbie Castiller
189W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Donna Misa
47W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Stacy Brehm
92W–161L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Laura Malahias
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Chrissy King
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.35
Elizabeth Arnold
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Wright
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.