Teams

Westwood Godsey

2026 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 5.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-07vs Belmont Bond 5.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSeth Feibelman / Joseph Brown vs Romain Ambert / Juan Gamboa0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKevin Long vs Justin Cerny0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKonstantin Dombrovskiy / Erik Wright vs Robert Wagner / Alfredo Rodriguez0-6, 1-6
2026-05-31vs Belmont Bond 5.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesPatrick Gee / David Reed vs Diego Alejandro Parada / Juan Gamboa6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRandy Loden / Seth Feibelman vs Alfredo Rodriguez / Romain Ambert6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-17vs Belmont Bond 5.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Reed / Jack Allen vs Diego Marti Vertiz / Diego Alejandro Parada6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesColin Mudrick vs Dillon Sykes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Gee / Kevin Long vs Romain Ambert / Aaron Paul6-7, 4-6
2026-05-10vs Belmont Bond 5.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Reed / Jack Allen vs Justin Cerny / Diego Marti Vertiz6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGlenn Diersen vs Dillon Sykes7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSeth Feibelman / Konstantin Dombrovskiy vs Jeremy New / Drew Campbell4-6, 6-7
2026-04-28vs Belmont Bond 5.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Reed / Joseph Brown vs Moses Hutchison / Jeremy New7-5, 6-7
L#1 SinglesColin Mudrick vs Rishi Charan Shankar1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJack Allen / Seth Feibelman vs Robert Wagner / Alfredo Rodriguez3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-26vs Belmont Bond 5.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRaymond Kanyo / Konstantin Dombrovskiy vs Drew Campbell / Rishi Charan Shankar2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesColin Mudrick vs Dillon Sykes4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErik Wright / Jack Allen vs Aaron Paul / Diego Marti Vertiz4-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs Belmont Bond 5.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Long / Joseph Brown vs Drew Campbell / Jeremy New2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGlenn Diersen vs Rishi Charan Shankar4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Gee / Erik Wright vs Alfredo Rodriguez / Robert Wagner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-04vs Belmont Bond 5.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRandy Loden / Joseph Brown vs Rishi Charan Shankar / Justin Cerny7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Reed vs Moses Hutchison7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatrick Gee / Seth Feibelman vs Drew Campbell / Diego Alejandro Parada5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Belmont Bond 5.08018616185
2Westwood Godsey0861839269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Glenn Diersen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.60
Patrick Gee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.57
Colin Mudrick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.56
Joseph Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.53
Jack Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.49
David Reed
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 5
4.42
Konstantin Dombrovskiy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.41
Seth Feibelman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.40
Kevin Long
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.22
Richard Godsey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Erik Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Loden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Raymond Kanyo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Brown + Kevin Long033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Glenn Diersen
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Patrick Gee
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.60
5
Colin Mudrick
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.57
Joseph Brown
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.56
Jack Allen
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.53
5
David Reed
6W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.49
5
Konstantin Dombrovskiy
71W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.42
Seth Feibelman
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.41
Kevin Long
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.40
Richard Godsey
8W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Erik Wright
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
3.75
Randy Loden
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raymond Kanyo
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.