Teams

Team Racket

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-16vs KRC A TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Inouye / Abel Siu Ho vs Ian Greene / Brian Weinstein6-1, 7-5
2025-08-09vs KRC ContendersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Prudente / Dustin Valdez vs Scott Nishikawa / David Pascua7-5, 6-3
2025-08-02vs Tennis Villians 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAbel Siu Ho / Dustin Valdez vs Richard Ho / Angus Huang3-6, 1-6
2025-07-26vs KRC A TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Inouye / Jason Prudente vs Ian Greene / Carlos Oliveira3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-19vs KRC ContendersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Inouye / Dustin Valdez vs David Pascua / Bill Ellis2-6, 5-3
2025-07-13vs Tennis Villians 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Inouye / Jason Prudente vs Christopher Young / Richard Ho0-6, 2-6
2025-07-06vs KRC A TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesDustin Valdez / Abel Siu Ho vs Erik Burian / Carlos Oliveira6-4, 7-6
2025-06-29vs KRC ContendersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Prudente / Abel Siu Ho vs Erik Boerstler / Scott Nishikawa4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-22vs Tennis Villians 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Inouye / Raymond Bolanos vs Richard Ho / Derek Chun1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Villians 3.59090245
2Team Racket54541091
3KRC Contenders36361292
4KRC A Team181817108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Matthew Inouye
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Jason Prudente
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Dustin Valdez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Abel Siu Ho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Raymond Bolanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Inouye + Raymond Bolanos4839% games−7.1% vs expected
Abel Siu Ho + Matthew Inouye224 matchesnot enough data
Abel Siu Ho + Dustin Valdez224 matchesnot enough data
Jason Prudente + Abel Siu Ho213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Inouye
48W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jason Prudente
104W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Dustin Valdez
21W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Abel Siu Ho
90W–84L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Raymond Bolanos
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.