Teams

Flowers

2023 Leon Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-05vs VoorheesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Jennifer Ungru vs Susan Ault / Brenda Jahn6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary MacKo / Teresa Ransom vs Claire Chiara / Denise Whitlock6-0, 6-1
2023-11-07vs VoorheesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ungru / Catherine Cooper vs Candace Beauvais / Claire Chiara6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeresa Ransom / Vilma Quant vs Susan Ault / Suzanne Pridgeon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-31vs Leon/Marino/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Espy / Robyn Flowers vs Amy Kirkpatrick / Leah Marino3-6, 3-6
2023-10-17vs VoorheesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Juliet Hauser vs Catherine McRae / Kathy Maus3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobyn Flowers / Julie Espy vs Anna Grace Lewis / Mary Vanlandingham7-6, 7-5
2023-10-10vs Leon/Marino/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Juliet Hauser vs Amy Kirkpatrick / Leah Marino6-7, 2-6
2023-09-26vs VoorheesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Espy / Vilma Quant vs Brenda Jahn / Catherine McRae0-6, 0-6
2023-09-19vs Leon/Marino/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Espy / Kim Bertron vs Amy Kirkpatrick / Leah Marino2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Julie Espy
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Teresa Ransom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Christelle Roper
published 3.5
2.88
Leslee Simpson
published
2.67
Vilma Quant
published
Karen Devorace
published
Kim Bertron
published
Mary MacKo
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Robyn Flowers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Cooper + Julie Espy13953% games+2.9% vs expected
Mary MacKo + Teresa Ransom3259% gamesnot enough data
Vilma Quant + Leslee Simpson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julie Espy
146W–128L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Catherine Cooper
128W–131L career · 10 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Teresa Ransom
44W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christelle Roper
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
Leslee Simpson
2W–19L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.88
Vilma Quant
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Karen Devorace
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Bertron
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary MacKo
81W–69L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robyn Flowers
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.