Teams

SRTC-Boykin

2022 OH OV WINTER A55&O · 2022 Winter A55&O 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-06vs KTC-HeatonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Bremar / Candace Holthouse vs Marianne Saunders / Sue Karnitis6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori James / Cheryl Shimmin vs Cynthia Dull / Sara Walk4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJanet Culley / Cheryl Long vs Marina Wille / Margaret Neikirk4-6, 3-6
2022-04-22vs KTC-GarzaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay Bremar / Tillie Terzakis vs Molly Wagner / Sunhe Rhee6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLori James / Dianne Kronour vs Lyuda Fishman / Beth Brown6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Hoffman / Candace Holthouse vs Laura Garza / Kelly Scudder1-6, 3-6
2022-04-08vs STC-RobinsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesTillie Terzakis / Janet Culley vs Skylla Frye / Terri Logan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori James / Dianne Kronour vs Kimberly Robinson / Patricia Robinson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Shimmin / Cheryl Long vs Marianna Wright / Annette Ross-Gray7-6, 6-3
2022-04-01vs KTC-HeatonLost 12
L#1 DoublesTillie Terzakis / Dianne Kronour vs Marianne Saunders / Sue Karnitis2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChetana Wilkins / Candace Holthouse vs Rebecca Schwenker / Donna Silvert2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLindsay Bremar / Karen Hoffman vs Cynthia Dull / Sara Walk6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-25vs STC-RobinsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCandace Holthouse / Janet Culley vs Kimberly Robinson / Patricia Robinson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori James / Cheryl Shimmin vs Janice Bensman / Skylla Frye0-6, 4-6
2022-03-18vs KTC-GarzaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPam Howell / Lori James vs Kathryn Staiger / Jill Weckesser4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDianne Kronour / Tillie Terzakis vs Sunhe Rhee / Molly Wagner6-3, 6-4
2022-03-11vs STC-RobinsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesLindsay Bremar / Janet Culley vs Skylla Frye / Terri Logan7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCandace Holthouse / Cheryl Shimmin vs Kimberly Robinson / Patricia Robinson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDianne Kronour / Karen Hoffman vs Janice Bensman / Michelle Conrad1-6, 2-6
2022-03-04vs KTC-HeatonWon 20
W#1 DoublesTillie Terzakis / Lindsay Bremar vs Margaret Neikirk / Donna Silvert6-2, 5-4
W#2 DoublesCandace Holthouse / Cheryl Shimmin vs Cynthia Rank / Sharyl Gardner6-7, 3-2, 1-0
2022-02-18vs KTC-GarzaLost 03
L#1 DoublesDianne Kronour / Tillie Terzakis vs Sunhe Rhee / Molly Wagner2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCandace Holthouse / Pam Howell vs Bonnie Bennett / Kim McCrae6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Culley / Karen Hoffman vs Pamela Disser / Kelly Scudder6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Winter A55&O 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Lindsay Bremar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Lori James
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Janet Culley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.10
Chetana Wilkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Cheryl Shimmin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Tillie Terzakis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Candace Holthouse
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Deidra Boykin
published 3.5
Cheryl Long
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dianne Kronour
published
Pam Howell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Bremar + Karen Hoffman6164% games+11.3% vs expected
Lindsay Bremar + Cheryl Shimmin5751% games+9.5% vs expected
Chetana Wilkins + Lindsay Bremar12755% games+9.0% vs expected
Janet Culley + Lindsay Bremar271655% games+4.1% vs expected
Lindsay Bremar + Lori James11455% games+0.5% vs expected
Lindsay Bremar + Tillie Terzakis5352% games−0.4% vs expected
Chetana Wilkins + Lori James6551% games−0.4% vs expected
Tillie Terzakis + Lori James6550% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Bremar
133W–140L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lori James
92W–109L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Janet Culley
52W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Chetana Wilkins
81W–92L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Hoffman
68W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Cheryl Shimmin
83W–127L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Tillie Terzakis
73W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Candace Holthouse
48W–85L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Deidra Boykin
24W–48L career · type S · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
2.70
Cheryl Long
11W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Dianne Kronour
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Howell
64W–111L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.