Teams

Escambia/Haack/40&Over9.0MXD

2024 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-18vs Wise - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Yager / Lori Gonzalez vs Cosme Barrios / Jennifer Passeretti6-3, 6-3
2024-02-07vs Wise - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven King / Jami Steinmetz vs Zachary Schweigert / Debbie Wroten6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-01-31vs Wise - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteven King / Kim Pennington vs Cosme Barrios / Jennifer Passeretti4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrett Worley / Krysta Lee vs Jeff Crigler / Michelle Covell6-2, 6-3
2024-01-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrett Worley / Lauren Haack vs Bob Olliff / Debbie Wroten6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-01-15vs Wise - PCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuss Parris / Lori Gonzalez vs Zachary Schweigert / Debbie Wroten6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlenn Shane / Claudia Simmons vs Cosme Barrios / Julie Schneidt7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2024-01-10vs Wise - PCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Brown / Claudia Simmons vs Brian Jordan / Shaner Garner Crooke4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.38
Carel Demanss
published 4.5
4.34
Lori Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Kim Pennington
published
4.15
Lauren Haack
published
4.12
Steven King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Krysta Lee
published
4.02
Jami Steinmetz
published
3.83
Russ Parris
published
3.82
3.69
Michael Yager
published
3.63
Brett Worley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Glenn Shane
published
William Morris
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Claudia Simmons
159W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Carel Demanss
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
4.38
Lori Gonzalez
127W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
Kim Pennington
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
4.15
Steven King
30W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
4.12
Krysta Lee
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Jami Steinmetz
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Russ Parris
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Christopher Brown
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Michael Yager
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Brett Worley
94W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Glenn Shane
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
William Morris
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.