Teams

Team 1 DMV Tennis Club

2026 NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-22vs Team 2 Westwood Team Fever TreeLost 12
W#1 DoublesKyu Choi / Asher Keam vs Kenny Day / Jan Neumann1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJihoon Kim / Krishna Polisetty vs Eric Joseph / David Turner1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDukyong Jacob Lee / Yong Ryu vs Ivan Blas / John Motz6-7, 1-6
2026-03-12vs Team 3 Belle HavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesAsher Keam / Kyu Choi vs Bruce MacHanic / Daniel Orourke6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRyan Kim / Quinn Fiscus vs Peter Davidson / Whitaker Askew6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDukyong Jacob Lee / Yong Ryu vs Jeremy Carl / Michael Fogarty4-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs Team 2 Westwood Team Fever TreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAsher Keam / Quinn Fiscus vs Alexander Assaley / Jose Torres6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHo Kim / Ryan Kim vs Danny McBride / John Donelson1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKyungho Ahn / Yong Ryu vs Dan Winicour / John Motz1-6, 3-6
2026-02-19vs Team 3 Belle HavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesKyu Choi / Krishna Polisetty vs Daniel Orourke / Brian Clay0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJihoon Kim / Kyungho Ahn vs Peter Davidson / John O'Dwyer1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesYong Ryu / Dukyong Jacob Lee vs Whitaker Askew / Michael Fogarty1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-07vs Team 2 Westwood Team Fever TreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAsher Keam / Kyu Choi vs Kevin Killeavy / Danny McBride2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesQuinn Fiscus / Kyungho Ahn vs Jose Torres / Alexander Assaley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Kim / Jihoon Kim vs Richard Laukitis / Nathan Leslie2-6, 1-6
2026-01-29vs Team 3 Belle HavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesAsher Keam / Quinn Fiscus vs Daniel Orourke / Peter Davidson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKyungho Ahn / Ho Kim vs John O'Dwyer / Jeremy Carl2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJihoon Kim / Ryan Kim vs Michael Fogarty / Kaj Vetter7-5, 6-4
2026-01-15vs Team 3 Belle HavenLost 12
W#1 DoublesAsher Keam / Kyu Choi vs Greg Woodford / Jeremy Carl4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHo Kim / Ryan Kim vs Daniel Orourke / Bruce MacHanic3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDukyong Jacob Lee / Yong Ryu vs John O'Dwyer / Kaj Vetter0-6, 0-6
2026-01-03vs Team 2 Westwood Team Fever TreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAsher Keam / Quinn Fiscus vs Ivan Blas / Kenny Day5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKrishna Polisetty / Kyu Choi vs Richard Laukitis / Soheil Shirzadi6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJihoon Kim / Kyungho Ahn vs Eric Joseph / John Donelson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Asher Keam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Quinn Fiscus
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.98
Kyu Choi
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.89
Ho Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Dukyong Jacob Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Jihoon Kim
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Krishna Polisetty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Kyungho Ahn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Yong Ryu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jihoon Kim + Kyungho Ahn2347% games+9.3% vs expected
Krishna Polisetty + Jihoon Kim16658% games+7.6% vs expected
Asher Keam + Kyu Choi2347% games+1.6% vs expected
Ho Kim + Kyungho Ahn2447% games+1.1% vs expected
Krishna Polisetty + Kyu Choi3252% games−2.9% vs expected
Kyu Choi + Jihoon Kim314 matchesnot enough data
Dukyong Jacob Lee + Yong Ryu044 matchesnot enough data
Asher Keam + Quinn Fiscus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Asher Keam
4W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Quinn Fiscus
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Kyu Choi
41W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
Ho Kim
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Dukyong Jacob Lee
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Jihoon Kim
36W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Krishna Polisetty
79W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Kyungho Ahn
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Yong Ryu
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.