Teams

S-LSSTEFFEY/Jetton 3.5

2022 Lake 18 & Over Summer Singles · Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-30vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesJana Ritter vs Kim Beazlie1-6, 4-6
2022-07-23vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCortney Griffin vs Melissa Collins6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDanielle Mikolajczyk vs Nicole Kayton6-0, 3-1
2022-07-16vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesTabitha Elledge vs Candace Newman6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKaren Ray vs Kristen Rogers6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesDanielle Mikolajczyk vs Kathleen Stiffler3-6, 4-6
2022-07-09vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesDanielle Mikolajczyk vs Kathleen Stiffler0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKaren Ray vs Kim Beazlie0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCortney Griffin vs Nicole Kayton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-02vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesTabitha Elledge vs Kristen Rogers6-1, 7-5
2022-06-25vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesJana Ritter vs Stacy Beardslee6-3, 6-3
2022-06-11vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesJana Ritter vs Kathleen Stiffler3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTabitha Elledge vs Kim Beazlie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-04vs SLMCollins/Westport SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesTabitha Elledge vs Melissa Collins6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJana Ritter vs Candace Newman6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Tabitha Elledge
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.58
Jana Ritter
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Danielle Mikolajczyk
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Cortney Griffin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Karen Ray
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Shelly Steffey
published
Claudia Bareis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cortney Griffin + Tabitha Elledge5457% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tabitha Elledge
172W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Jana Ritter
109W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Danielle Mikolajczyk
141W–103L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Cortney Griffin
156W–91L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Karen Ray
105W–158L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Shelly Steffey
54W–40L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Claudia Bareis
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.