← Teams

MAC-Haddon

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.28 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
David Mittelstadt
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.10
Nathan Austin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.02
Mike Easton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Christopher Haddon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.93
Rodrigo Aguilar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
John Helmer III
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Alex Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
James Ringelberg
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.57
Thomas Turnbull
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Results7 ties
2022-05-22Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMike Easton / Mark Simpson vs Renato Bernasconi Zuccari / Paul Wulf7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Austin / John Helmer III vs Michael Sather / Steve Vanderploeg6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Thomas Turnbull vs Joerg Droste / Luke Filose6-3, 6-2
2022-05-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMike Easton / John Helmer III vs Rusty Williams / Jeffrey Hunt7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlex Young / David Mittelstadt vs John McCroskey / Honorato Wenceslao6-3, 6-4
2022-05-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChristopher Haddon / David White vs Todd DeNeffe / John Ezelle4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMike Easton vs Alex Simpson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Nathan Austin vs Tom Lux / David Finkelman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-30Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesDaniel Tseng / John Helmer III vs Matthew Owen / Josiah Whitman6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMike Easton vs Chaitanya Rayasam6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Haddon / James Ringelberg vs Mitchell Strauss / Mike McNairy6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Turnbull / David White vs Glenn Woodworth / Mark Vukanovich4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChristopher Haddon / Nathan Austin vs Jimmy Crumpacker / Greg Masson6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMike Easton vs Frank Lippy6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / Mark Simpson vs Andrew Nilsson / Benjamin Yang6-3, 6-1
2022-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDavid White / Thomas Turnbull vs Thomas McGirk / Craig Austin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Tseng / Alex Young vs Toby Weber / James Feeney4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Nathan Austin vs Rymn Parsons / Matthew Condit6-1, 6-1
2022-04-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChristopher Haddon / Nathan Austin vs Chris Rivera / Jeb Hubbs6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Simpson / Alex Young vs Colin Arnold / Amahal Barbee6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid White / Mike Easton vs Charles Taguet / Dave Vinik6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
David Mittelstadt
68W–34L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Nathan Austin
67W–78L career
3%96%0%
4.10
4.5
Mike Easton
52W–45L career
16%84%0%
4.02
4.5
Christopher Haddon
39W–77L career
25%75%0%
3.96
4.5
Rodrigo Aguilar
37W–36L career
38%62%0%
3.93
4
John Helmer III
16W–22L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
Alex Young
42W–22L career
0%96%3%
3.84
4
James Ringelberg
73W–77L career
8%92%0%
3.63
4
Thomas Turnbull
86W–92L career
16%84%0%
3.57

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.