Teams

Sarasota/Harris/65&Over7.0W

2023 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Monday

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-22vs LWR Varsity GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Matthews / Cathy Stutzman vs Lisa Ceccacci / Emily Ebers4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-06vs University Park BarrySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Betsy Nelson / Ursula Ruckli6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Matthews / Cathy Stutzman vs Mary Barry / Dodie Shuert6-3, 6-3
2023-02-27vs Courtside IrishWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandra Osborne / Donna Spielberger vs Mary Louise Callahan / Rebecca Kiene6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Matthews / Mary Welch vs Mary Lou Irish / Sally Pym6-2, 6-1
2023-02-20vs Mission Valley LarabeeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Jennifer Jaworski / Ann Larabee6-1, 6-2
2023-02-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Katie Cornell / Patricia Sheller6-0, 6-1
2023-02-06vs University Park BarryWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Betsy Nelson / Deborah van Brunt6-2, 6-3
2023-01-30vs Plantation TippettWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Marilyn Houston / Marylynn Miles6-3, 6-1
2023-01-23vs Payne Park HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Sigi Moriece / JoMarie Privitera6-2, 6-3
2023-01-16vs LWR Varsity GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Patricia Cunningham / Emily Ebers6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Donna Spielberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Alice Levine
published 3.5
3.26
Catherine Hynes
published 3.5
Joyce Ottinger
published
Julie Harris
published
Karen Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Welch
published
Sandra Osborne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Spielberger + Alice Levine5162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Spielberger
50W–38L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Alice Levine
49W–37L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Catherine Hynes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Joyce Ottinger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Matthews
53W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Welch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Osborne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.