Teams

LRC-Ash-WINNERS

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-09vs GTC-O'Donnell-Slicer-DicersLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Franz / Connie Worthen vs Jacqueline DeLeon / Mary Souza7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Seiwerath / Kate Perry vs Marsha White / Cynthia Skinner2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCHARLOTTE ASH / Elaine Andrews vs Cassandra Sparks / Kathy Heinz2-6, 4-6
2022-05-20vs HBSQ-Tierney/SmalleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Waldron / Susan Bussell vs Maurene Cronyn / Pamela Steele1-6, 1-6
2022-05-19vs GTC-O'Donnell-Slicer-DicersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathleen Franz / Connie Worthen vs Barbara van Sickle / Kathy Shouse6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Seiwerath / Peggy Thurston vs Casey Hunter / Kelly Compton0-6, 1-6
2022-05-16vs TCSP-Super 65's-LullLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Knight / Pamela Waldron vs Noel Angell / Martha Tucker6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-13vs GTC-O'Donnell-Slicer-DicersLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebby Sigel / Connie Worthen vs Marsha White / Kathy Shouse6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Perry / Pamela Waldron vs Barbara van Sickle / Mary Souza2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Thurston / Margaret Ellis vs Casey Hunter / Kelly Compton1-6, 2-6
2022-04-25vs HBSQ-LohmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Waldron / Ann Knight vs Char Hogan / Michele Simmons3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-22vs GTC-O'Donnell-Slicer-DicersLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebby Sigel / Connie Worthen vs Barbara van Sickle / Jacqueline DeLeon2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Franz / Pamela Waldron vs Marsha White / Kathy Shouse3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Ellis / Elaine Andrews vs Casey Hunter / Cynthia Skinner3-6, 0-6
2022-04-14vs GTC-O'Donnell-Slicer-DicersLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Franz / Kate Perry vs Marsha White / Kathy Shouse2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesElaine Andrews / Mary Ann Seiwerath vs Casey Hunter / Kelly Compton4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCHARLOTTE ASH / Pamela Waldron vs Cassandra Sparks / Kathy Heinz2-6, 1-6
2022-04-13vs BETC-McClearyLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Waldron / Ann Knight vs Carolyn Cruzat / Barbara Selemon2-6, 4-6
2022-04-07vs GTC-O'Donnell-Slicer-DicersLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Andrews / Kate Perry vs Kelly Compton / Barbara van Sickle0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesConnie Worthen / Kathleen Franz vs Cassandra Sparks / Kathy Heinz6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCHARLOTTE ASH / Margaret Ellis vs Jacqueline DeLeon / Mary Souza2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Kate Perry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Connie Worthen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.41
Debby Sigel
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
CHARLOTTE ASH
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elaine Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathleen Franz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Margaret Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Ann Seiwerath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Peggy Thurston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debby Sigel + Connie Worthen9848% games+0.3% vs expected
Kate Perry + Connie Worthen1738% games−8.5% vs expected
Kate Perry + Debby Sigel2347% gamesnot enough data
Kate Perry + Mary Ann Seiwerath1440% gamesnot enough data
Kate Perry + Kathleen Franz033 matchesnot enough data
Debby Sigel + Margaret Ellis213 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Franz + Connie Worthen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kate Perry
19W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Connie Worthen
54W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
3
Debby Sigel
33W–46L career · 7 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.41
CHARLOTTE ASH
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Elaine Andrews
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Franz
4W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Ellis
11W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Ann Seiwerath
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Waldron
9W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Thurston
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.