Teams

Passing Shots 4.5

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Men's 4.5 18s

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-26vs Four PointersLost 01
L#2 DoublesDennis Taylor / Bredt Norwood vs Jacob Marek / Jean-Sebastien Ronchi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-12vs Westwood 4.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDennis Taylor / Ryan Robles vs Mark Werner / Berkley Simmons4-6, 3-6
2022-05-30vs Wilco Warriors 4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Robles / Dennis Taylor vs Kalim Sawires / Phillip Langley6-0, 6-0
2022-05-22vs Westover LamburgersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDennis Taylor / Kevin Schillinger vs Jim Rizk / Chris Beevers2-6, 0-6
2022-05-08vs AusTennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesElan Vasudevan / Dennis Taylor vs Larry Brumfield / Scott Sevin1-6, 1-6
2022-05-01vs Bad AcesLost 01
L#1 SinglesDennis Taylor vs Dusty Duke0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Kevin Schillinger
published
4.22
Devin Stauffer
published 4.5
4.19
Cody Everett
published 4.5
4.08
Daniel Garza
published 4.5
4.05
Dennis Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 4.5
3.86
Bredt Norwood
published 4
3.78
Elan Vasudevan
published 4
Alok Kumar
published 4
3.70
Ryan Robles
published
3.55
Anthony Horsley
published 4
Joseph Walters
published
Ray Wang
published
Timothy Staley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Robles + Dennis Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Schillinger
28W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Devin Stauffer
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Cody Everett
32W–30L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Daniel Garza
12W–30L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Dennis Taylor
55W–61L career · 12 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Bredt Norwood
29W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Elan Vasudevan
20W–45L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Alok Kumar
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Robles
33W–42L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Anthony Horsley
18W–33L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Joseph Walters
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ray Wang
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Staley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.