Teams

2*KMcWhorter-HVCC

2024 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-31vs 7*NDolan-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Eniko Nagy6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Michelle Koeneke7-6, 6-4
2024-07-28vs 8*GLoFrese-EPHWon 20
W#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Becki Cleveland5-1
W#3 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Janet Ranheim7-5, 6-3
2024-07-24vs 3*MLong-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Taqiyya Yasin6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Kelli Moore6-0, 6-0
2024-06-28vs 6*MMacdonald-HSWon 10
W#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Altagracia Evert6-1, 6-1
2024-06-14vs 4*KTravis-EnoWon 21
W#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Julie DeConto7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Beth Dingler3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Tracey Maurer7-5, 6-3
2024-06-07Won 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Tracy Crowley6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Laurie Droke4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-31vs 1*LBible-EnoWon 21
W#1 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Jennifer Cantwell6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Loralie Bible6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Kelly Conklin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kim McWhorter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Hadley Nixon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Rhiannon Ludington
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.08
Betsy Euler
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
published 3
2.59
Kensy Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Euler + Kim McWhorter4253% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Hadley Nixon044 matchesnot enough data
Kim McWhorter + Rhiannon Ludington224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Rhiannon Ludington
93W–83L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Betsy Euler
139W–108L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Kensy Ryan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.