Teams

Junkins

2021 · 2022 NOGTA USTA Mixed 18 & Over - Fall

26 players · average NTRP 3.91 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2022 NOGTA USTA Mixed 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Wheatcroft
published 4.5
Gina Salisbury
published 4.5
3.93
Laura Ketcham
published
3.83
3.75
Edis Krnjic
published 4
3.74
Dwayne Bordelon
published 4
3.69
Stacy Sorrow
published
3.69
Stacy Sorrow
published
3.69
Jacob Quast
published 4
3.69
Jacob Quast
published 4
3.63
Gary Quast
published 4
3.63
Gary Quast
published 4
3.55
Felice Hadden
published 4
3.55
Felice Hadden
published 4
3.54
Becky Quast
published 4
3.54
Becky Quast
published 4
3.40
Gregory Hadden
published 3.5
3.40
Gregory Hadden
published 3.5
3.24
James Angland
published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Rauch
published
3.18
Sket Angland
published
3.17
Scott Sorrow
published
2.65
Lee Carroll
published
2.58
Ann Carroll
published 3
Ken Ellinger
published
Mary Skahan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Quast + Edis Krnjic4157% games+1.8% vs expected
Laura Ketcham + Michelle Rauch404 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Sorrow + Laura Ketcham213 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Sorrow + Michelle Rauch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Wheatcroft
1W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Gina Salisbury
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Ketcham
75W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Caitlin Michaelis
22W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Edis Krnjic
45W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dwayne Bordelon
0W–9L career · type M · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Stacy Sorrow
46W–34L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Stacy Sorrow
46W–34L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jacob Quast
27W–15L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jacob Quast
27W–15L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gary Quast
3W–24L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Gary Quast
3W–24L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Felice Hadden
19W–21L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Felice Hadden
19W–21L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Becky Quast
13W–35L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Becky Quast
13W–35L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Gregory Hadden
18W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Gregory Hadden
18W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
James Angland
23W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Michelle Rauch
33W–35L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sket Angland
32W–38L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Scott Sorrow
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Lee Carroll
15W–32L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Ken Ellinger
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Skahan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.