Teams

Foxy Ladies-Wakamatsu/Graham

2021 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Buchman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.16
Brooke Daugherty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Kirsten Giacomini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Kana Wakamatsu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results6 ties
2021-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Graham / Kirsten Giacomini vs Jeanette Thomas / Linda Barker6-1, 7-5
2021-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Daugherty / Kana Wakamatsu vs Terri Gotcher / June Kim6-4, 6-3
2021-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Graham / Kana Wakamatsu vs Angie Lee / Lily Looi6-3, 6-1
2021-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Daugherty / Allison Buchman vs Claire Thayer / Dalika Crawford6-1, 6-2
2021-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Graham / Kana Wakamatsu vs Nancy Atkins / Corinne Strauser7-6, 6-4
2021-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Graham / Kana Wakamatsu vs Anne Fahlbusch / Judith Kobin6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Allison Buchman
95W–27L career
not enough data
4.5
Brooke Daugherty
90W–29L career
5%92%2%
4.16
4
Kirsten Giacomini
93W–48L career
0%97%3%
3.83
4
Kana Wakamatsu
60W–63L career
42%58%0%
3.47

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.