Teams

TTA BLUE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs LTA-Q REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith Jones / DAN WISKE vs Brandon Shaffer / Kevin Edwards1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlex Lu vs Milt Anderson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Lopez / Paul Sattizahn vs Samuel Swift / Craig Harvey6-1, 7-5
2026-08-12vs BTA-C ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesMax Olivas / Robert Lopez vs Scott MacBride / Adam Wigod-Morse3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDAN WISKE / Steven Allscheid vs Chris Decicco / David Requiro7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-08-05vs CVTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Sattizahn / Alex Lu vs Timothy Tyrrell / Kelly McKee6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott McCool / Max Olivas vs Thomas Lastick / Josh Bartley6-3, 7-6
2026-07-29vs LTA-Q REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKeith Jones / Steven Allscheid vs Samuel Swift / Kevin Edwards7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesScott McCool vs Ronan Heaney7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Sattizahn / Robert Lopez vs James Walker / Craig Harvey6-3, 6-2
2026-07-22vs BTA-C ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesScott McCool / Keith Jones vs Jack Lange / Sean Maloney4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlex Lu vs David Requiro1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Allscheid / Max Olivas vs Adam Wigod-Morse / Scott MacBride2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Scott McCool
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.78
Paul Sattizahn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Andrew Eastridge
published 4
3.68
Steven Allscheid
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
DAN WISKE
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Alex Lu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Max Olivas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Robert Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Allscheid + DAN WISKE2346% games−3.1% vs expected
Paul Sattizahn + Alex Lu404 matchesnot enough data
Paul Sattizahn + Andrew Eastridge123 matchesnot enough data
Max Olivas + Scott McCool213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott McCool
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Paul Sattizahn
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Andrew Eastridge
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Steven Allscheid
100W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
DAN WISKE
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Alex Lu
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Max Olivas
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Robert Lopez
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.