Teams

JSwanson (Springfield)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-09vs CLee/KArenson (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJen Abernathy vs Maria Gritsay1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErica Turkus / Maureen Metzger vs Kelli Arenson / Stephanie Baker3-6, 2-6
2022-05-02vs JGentile (The Club at Longview)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJen Abernathy / Erica Turkus vs Jessica Kuperman / Alisa Hood7-6, 6-2
2022-04-25vs KDouglas/SLang (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJen Abernathy / Gretchen Orr vs Alisa Longo / Jenny Harper3-6, 2-6
2022-04-04vs MMetzl/KJohnson (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Stewart Chatman / Annmarie Ringle vs Erica Adcock / Erin Zelickson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-29vs LBrandt/TMacuga (Park Crossing)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Swanson / Annmarie Ringle vs Molly Brown / Tish Macuga4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesErica Turkus vs Hilary Lee2-6, 2-6
2022-03-28vs AWagner/KHoracek (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesErica Turkus / Annmarie Ringle vs Stacie Brown / Amy Dobson6-2, 6-2
2022-03-21vs ETindel (Charlotte Country Club)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Ringle / Leslie Illingworth vs Elizabeth Fagg / Emily Tindel5-7, 6-7
2022-03-14vs MMcArdle (Weddington Chase)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTrena Thomas / Annmarie Ringle vs Lutfiye Ugurlu / Michelle McArdle1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErica Turkus / Natalie Demby vs Jenn Jones / Barbara Wu3-6, 4-6
2022-03-07vs SKwon (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesErica Turkus / Jen Abernathy vs Brittany Russell / Jessica Babinski6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
2.86
Erica Turkus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.68
Annmarie Ringle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.40
Jen Abernathy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Gretchen Orr
published
Julie Swanson
published
Melissa Warren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Abernathy + Erica Turkus7258% gamesnot enough data
Annmarie Ringle + Erica Turkus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Stewart Chatman
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Erica Turkus
74W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Annmarie Ringle
36W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Jen Abernathy
29W–37L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40
Gretchen Orr
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Swanson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Warren
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.