Teams

BWinkelman (FCC); Firethorne Nightowls

2024-2025 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 2.5 Women Doubles; Evening

3 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2025-02-05vs LCobb (Sardis); BLMVWon 10
W#1 DoublesHilary Burton / Brooke Winkelman vs Lory Cobb / Brittany Norman6-1, 6-1
2025-02-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / April Orf vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-30vs GParks (Veterans); First TimersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Noot / Brooke Winkelman vs Erin Dailey / Gabrielle Parks6-3, 6-1
2025-01-26vs APatton (PPRSC); JenalWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / Jill Ytterstad vs Alaine Patton / Jenna Vaporis6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / Jill Ytterstad vs Hollie Collins-Dean / Katie Sontag6-7, 4-6
2025-01-07vs MWarren (Springfield)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesApril Orf / Brooke Winkelman vs Melissa Warren / Annmarie Ringle1-6, 0-6
2025-01-05vs LSupernavage (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / Jill Ytterstad vs Krista Gibson / Lucinda Supernavage4-6, 3-6
2024-12-16vs SBurke/Wolff (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Noot / Julie Moran vs Carmen Lettre / Shannon Burke6-3, 6-4
2024-12-03vs AKupchella (Park Road); OG LadiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Noot / Julie Moran vs Liz Hannah / Lydia Parker6-3, 6-3
2024-11-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMargie Keratsis / Brooke Winkelman vs Anne Williams / Allison York0-6, 2-6
2024-11-19vs SHayden (Springfield); Love AllWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Noot / Brooke Winkelman vs Sherry Hayden / Jillene McGovern6-0, 6-4
2024-11-13vs VSchmidt (PPRSC); TW & GSLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Ytterstad / Brooke Winkelman vs Virginia Schmidt / Trish Wilbur6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-07vs MWarren (Springfield)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / April Orf vs Melissa Warren / Mellisa Johnson1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJulie Moran / Sheri Noot vs Lauren Humphries / Donna Callinan7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Doubles; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Sheri Noot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.19
Brooke Winkelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jill Ytterstad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Winkelman + Sheri Noot9755% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sheri Noot
44W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Brooke Winkelman
32W–53L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Jill Ytterstad
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.