Teams

Di.Williams18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-09vs St.Grose18CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGillian Kelleher / Diane Williams vs Candice Kish / Heather Mordecai6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaurene Fitzgerald / Phoebe Hill vs Carol Hedley / Hope Pflaum4-6, 4-6
2023-10-03vs Sh.Littleton18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesLiz Arcos / Laurie Reiss vs Traci Crabtree / Sarah Soleim7-5, 6-0
2023-10-02vs As.McCollum18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesMallory Altneu / Laurie Reiss vs Juli Johnson / Sharyn Leaver6-4, 6-2
2023-09-25vs Le.Curran18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesAdriana Craft / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Rebecca Pompeo / Michele Storr1-6, 3-6
2023-09-18vs Ke.Foglia18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Amanda Davis vs Emily Larson / Sue Norcia2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarleigh Moore / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Julianne Stockbauer / Alice Touchette6-3, 6-2
2023-09-11vs Ap.Lyon18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenna Raynor / Liz Arcos vs Kaitlin Johnston / Julie Clark6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdriana Craft / Amy Gillespie vs Haleigh Broglin / Rachel McLean5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Diane Williams vs Susan Hackman / April Bazin3-6, 3-6
2023-09-07vs Bl.Leippe18C6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdriana Craft / Diane Williams vs Heather Hofmann / Wendy Sielaty6-2, 6-2
2023-08-23vs As.Adams18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesGillian Kelleher / Liz Arcos vs Skylar Poole / Emily Cutts2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAdriana Craft / Amy Gillespie vs Amanda Lindsay / Julie Kelly4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jenna Raynor
published
3.44
Liz Arcos
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Laurie Reiss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Adriana Craft
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Gillian Kelleher
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.86
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Phoebe Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Craft + Laurene Fitzgerald4447% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Reiss + Gillian Kelleher033 matchesnot enough data
Liz Arcos + Gillian Kelleher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Raynor
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Liz Arcos
193W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Laurie Reiss
234W–202L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Adriana Craft
61W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
165W–164L career · 7 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.