Teams

SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-07vs SGV Dare Doubles-Hofstad-WN/SU10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCristina Padron / Deborah Babineau vs Ellie Wei / Nicole Winslow6-7, 3-5
2025-11-30vs SGV Mo Better Dubs-DeRosa-WN/SA10Split 11
L#1 DoublesDeborah Babineau / Rumduol Vuong vs Theona Zhordania / Roseann DeRosa2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAbbey Everson / Annemarie Schnedler vs Xiaochun Wang / Carol Ecker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRumduol Vuong / May de Castro vs Irina Abadzheva / Rebecca Stokes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Babineau / Cristina Padron vs Ani Aratounians / Holly Wolfle Hall7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMay de Castro / Sean Ky vs Sandra Manion / Sharon Li3-6, 6-7
2025-10-25vs SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arroyo High-SA8Split 11
L#1 DoublesRumduol Vuong / Deborah Babineau vs Lorene Miller / Dana Boyan1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Peters / Anita Tang vs Veronica Saucedo / Jenniffer Wong6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMay de Castro / Diana Rochford vs Jenny Lin / Cathy Lee3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnita Tang / Deborah Babineau vs Maryann Yamamoto / Mae Huey6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Abbey Everson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Diana Rochford
published 4
3.72
Deborah Babineau
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Rumduol Vuong
published 4
3.57
Cristina Padron
published 3.5
3.56
May de Castro
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Anita Tang
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Sean Ky
published
3.20
Annemarie Schnedler
published 3.5
Stephanie Peters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Padron + May de Castro2449% games+10.2% vs expected
Rumduol Vuong + Deborah Babineau131648% games+4.3% vs expected
Sean Ky + Anita Tang9557% games−4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abbey Everson
157W–106L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Diana Rochford
22W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Deborah Babineau
108W–119L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Rumduol Vuong
57W–56L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Cristina Padron
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.57
4
May de Castro
35W–81L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Anita Tang
70W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Sean Ky
27W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Annemarie Schnedler
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Stephanie Peters
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.