Teams

De.Farmer40C2.5

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesKacey Barcliff / Jeanna Hastie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-03vs Ja.Bossert40C2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesKacey Barcliff / Jeanna Hastie vs Margaret Barham / Rachel Bonistalli6-3, 7-5
2025-09-15vs Me.McCaskill40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesKacey Barcliff / Jeanna Hastie vs Courtney Hicks / Tucker Andrews6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-13vs Ke.Hurter40C2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKacey Barcliff / Jeanna Hastie vs Kelly Hurter / Millie Raynor6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-06vs Ke.Nels40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesKacey Barcliff / Jeanna Hastie vs Carrie Martinelli / Lauren Gentile2-6, 1-6
2025-08-23vs Su.Potter40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesHenriette Nshunguye / Kacey Barcliff vs Grace Poole / Angie McNeill6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-16vs Ja.Bossert40C2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanna Hastie / Tiffany Scotton vs Margaret Barham / Laura Robison3-6, 0-6
2025-08-10vs Ke.Nels40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeanna Hastie / Kacey Barcliff vs Lauren Gentile / Nicole Nemmers3-6, 5-7
2025-08-09vs Ke.Hurter40C2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKacey Barcliff / Jeanna Hastie vs Rebecca Harris / Nina Schweitzer5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dempsey Farmer
published 4.5
2.38
Jeanna Hastie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 2.5
2.35
Henriette Nshunguye
published
2.29
Katherine Clarida
published
2.12
Tiffany Scotton
published
2.06
Hala Souid
published
2.03
Carol Ann Mcmillan
published 2.5
2.00
Clarissa McMathis
published 2.5
1.99
Kacey Barcliff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
1.86
Patrice Farmer
published
Tammera Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kacey Barcliff + Jeanna Hastie3449% gamesnot enough data
Kacey Barcliff + Carol Ann Mcmillan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dempsey Farmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Jeanna Hastie
30W–39L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Henriette Nshunguye
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Katherine Clarida
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Tiffany Scotton
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Hala Souid
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Carol Ann Mcmillan
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Clarissa McMathis
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Kacey Barcliff
41W–105L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Patrice Farmer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Tammera Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.