Teams

NJ GREEN

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 2.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-29vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Frederick / Sasha Siabriuk vs Maggie Gomer / Victoria Coulson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Burns / Karen Brennan vs Jacqueline Marquis / Sarah Poel6-1, 6-2
2024-04-22vs TTA GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamie Stroupe / Hayley Roane vs SONJA STANLEY / Jill Lentz6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSasha Siabriuk vs Kelly Weinland6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Brennan / Regina Stewart vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Stroupe / Regina Stewart vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-06vs MVCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Stroupe / Heidi Bankoff vs Jessica Rowe / Nancy Fairchild6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRegina Stewart vs Sarah Holst5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Burns / Sasha Siabriuk vs Heather Schram / Elizabeth Sones3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-30vs BP GREENSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJamie Stroupe vs Kelli E Barker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeidi Bankoff / Jennifer Burns vs Brandy Echery / Deb Hall7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Sasha Siabriuk
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.77
Hayley Roane
published
2.63
Jamie Stroupe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.46
Karen Brennan
published
2.32
Jennifer Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Cynthia Frederick
published 2.5
2.20
Regina Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Stewart + Jennifer Burns3450% gamesnot enough data
Regina Stewart + Jamie Stroupe2354% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Stroupe + Sasha Siabriuk303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Burns + Cynthia Frederick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sasha Siabriuk
28W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
Hayley Roane
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Jamie Stroupe
36W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Karen Brennan
5W–36L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Jennifer Burns
24W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Cynthia Frederick
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Regina Stewart
35W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.