Teams

RENO TENNIS CLUB/WASHOE TCX 18AM3.5A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-09vs RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#2 SinglesJacob Colacurcio vs Ford Corl5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-09vs RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesJacob Colacurcio vs Sebastian Alvarez6-3, 6-3
2022-05-15vs RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesJacob Colacurcio vs Marco Coronel6-4, 6-1
2022-05-01vs RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 SinglesJacob Colacurcio vs Marco Coronel6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
David AuCoin
published 4
3.86
Andrew Fleming
published 4
3.80
Elliot Schneer
published 4
3.68
Scott Pearson
published
3.64
Jacob Colacurcio
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.50
Daniel Brady
published 4
3.12
Frank Du
published 3.5
John Boyd
published
Lonny Dill
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David AuCoin
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Andrew Fleming
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Elliot Schneer
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Scott Pearson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Jacob Colacurcio
38W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Daniel Brady
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Frank Du
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
John Boyd
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lonny Dill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.