Teams

Three Chopt Smashers - Skorupa

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Edmondson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-31vs MAC GreenspoonLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Michelle Yu vs Susan Greenspoon / Michelle Jepson1-6, 1-6
2025-05-03vs Westwood Seredni/Walek 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Felicia Schooley vs Liza Joyner / Hayley Herrin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-19vs Raintree Racketeers - CheekLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmanda Edmondson vs Erin Lyons4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Anne Moore vs Helenah Grove / Ariel Trimiew1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Michelle Yu
published
3.14
Melissa Skorupa
published
3.10
Beth Parrish
published 3.5
3.07
Donna Hall
published
3.05
Felicia Schooley
published
3.02
Virginia Grigg
published
3.02
2.93
Katherine Mortimer
published
2.85
Donna Boykin
published
2.79
Amanda Edmondson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Anne Hennessey
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Boykin + Beth Parrish134 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Grigg + Katherine Mortimer123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Hall + Katherine Mortimer033 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Mortimer + Melissa Skorupa033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Yu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Melissa Skorupa
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Beth Parrish
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Donna Hall
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Felicia Schooley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Virginia Grigg
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Amanda Stoneburner
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Katherine Mortimer
7W–22L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93
Donna Boykin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Amanda Edmondson
27W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Anne Hennessey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.