Teams

Volley Parton

Mixed 40 & Over · 3.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-21vs DFL 40 +Won 21
W#1 DoublesGordon Kenaston / Anita Mischuk vs Olympia Tinsley / Max Sloss6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Block / Jay Porter vs Karen Yaffe / Philip Isaac7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Galasso / Lou Galasso vs Michelle Valvo / Jeffrey Greinke1-6, 4-6
2026-04-15vs DFL 40 +Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMargot M Ellis / Christopher Richied vs Olympia Tinsley / Jeffrey Greinke6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllison Galasso / Lou Galasso vs Karen Yaffe / Atif Khan1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Crump / Karl Coomler vs Linda Barrows / Carl Sandberg3-6, 1-6
2026-04-07vs DFL 40 +Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLesli Wood / Brad Walls vs Hannah Dillon / Chris Dillon3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMargot M Ellis / Gordon Kenaston vs Linda Barrows / Jeffrey Greinke6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Block / Christopher Richied vs Mary Palazzo / Max Sloss4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-01vs DFL 40 +Won 21
W#1 DoublesLesli Wood / Brad Walls vs Hannah Dillon / Atif Khan7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMargot M Ellis / Jay Porter vs Alisha Severson / Philip Isaac6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Crump / Karl Coomler vs Mary Palazzo / Max Sloss1-6, 0-6
2026-03-24vs DFL 40 +Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnita Mischuk / Gordon Kenaston vs Michelle Valvo / Chris Dillon1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLesli Wood / Brad Walls vs Olympia Tinsley / Jeffrey Greinke3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Galasso / Lou Galasso vs Alisha Severson / Carl Sandberg2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DFL 40 +4110511107
2Volley Parton1451020148

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Brad Walls
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Gordon Kenaston
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.84
Margot M Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Jay Porter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Christopher Richied
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Allison Galasso
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Anita Mischuk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Rebecca Block
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Adrienne Crump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karl Coomler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lesli Wood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lou Galasso
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Walls + Lesli Wood4246% gamesnot enough data
Lou Galasso + Allison Galasso1437% gamesnot enough data
Karl Coomler + Lesli Wood044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brad Walls
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gordon Kenaston
3W–6L career · type D · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Margot M Ellis
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Jay Porter
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Christopher Richied
20W–18L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Allison Galasso
1W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Anita Mischuk
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Rebecca Block
17W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Adrienne Crump
3W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Karl Coomler
6W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lesli Wood
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lou Galasso
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.