Teams

SDNC 8.0 Carmel Valley/ Kuba

2024 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer - SDNC · SDNC - 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-10vs SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ CaringalSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Lee / Becky Kuba vs Robert Brownhill / Anastasia Duboshina1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKenny Hawkins / Christine Golemb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-03vs SDNC 8.0 RSFTC/ KalenchSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKellie Jaquez / Brian Zimmerman vs Yvonne Kalench / Todd Vitale0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Golemb / Kenny Hawkins vs Michelle Crosby / Moffitt Timlake6-3, 6-2
2024-07-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesBecky Kuba / Daniel Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Golemb / Kenny Hawkins vs Sarena Talbert / Eugene Hotta6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKellie Jaquez / Brian Zimmerman vs Meredith Priestley / Hartley Miller6-2, 6-1
2024-06-15vs SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito TC/ FroydWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Zimmerman / Kellie Jaquez vs Robert Froyd / Frances Schnall5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKenny Hawkins / Christine Golemb vs Lori Roth / Michael Nasim7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kellie Jaquez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Robyn K F Leong
published
4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
3.98
Kenny Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Christine Golemb
published 4
3.65
Maria Ward
published
3.60
Becky Kuba
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.28
Bradley Blose
published 3.5
3.25
Brian Zimmerman
published 3.5
Jennifer FIelds
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Richardson + Bradley Blose4643% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kellie Jaquez
104W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
Robyn K F Leong
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Kenny Hawkins
139W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Christine Golemb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Ward
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Becky Kuba
178W–141L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Bradley Blose
5W–10L career · type M · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Brian Zimmerman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer FIelds
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.