Teams

Refund

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · Hold

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Hold have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Kathie Stronach
published 4.5
3.68
Kristal Nelson
published 4
3.36
CARLA FIELDS
published 3.5
3.33
Whitney Leab
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Jeffrey Pollack
published
2.76
Spencer Banzhaf
published
2.70
Donzell Newkirk
published
2.33
Lance Shrader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Trevor Richardson
published
Michelle Vedder
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kathie Stronach
76W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
4.42
4
Kristal Nelson
132W–73L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.68
3.5
CARLA FIELDS
13W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Whitney Leab
58W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Jeffrey Pollack
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.31
Spencer Banzhaf
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
Donzell Newkirk
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Lance Shrader
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Trevor Richardson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.27
Michelle Vedder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.