Teams

HHTL65/Helgeson/Shipyard

65 & Over · 65 & Over LLAS - Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-13vs GSTL65/Miley/StablesWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Dunn / Ann Lacarter vs Julie Coggeshall / Jane Miley6-3, 6-4
2024-10-13vs LLAS UPTA65A/Johnson/Spindle TreeLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Lacarter / Nancy Dunn vs Patti Kortenber / Pamela Turner5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over LLAS - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Mary Calahan-Hill
published
3.68
Janet Watanabe
published
3.59
Ann Lacarter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Sandra Ahearn
published
3.51
Nancy Dunn
published
3.41
Dede Laird
published 3.5
3.35
Karen Watford
published
3.32
Sieglinde Hahn
published
3.31
Janice Daniel
published
3.23
Donna Buchman
published
3.16
Lynn Helgeson
published
3.13
Julia Rummans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dede Laird + Sieglinde Hahn3351% games+7.2% vs expected
Lynn Helgeson + Julia Rummans11232% games−2.6% vs expected
Mary Calahan-Hill + Janet Watanabe5448% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Calahan-Hill
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Janet Watanabe
25W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Ann Lacarter
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Sandra Ahearn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Nancy Dunn
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Dede Laird
25W–55L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
Karen Watford
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Sieglinde Hahn
18W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
Janice Daniel
17W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Donna Buchman
4W–20L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.23
Lynn Helgeson
25W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.16
Julia Rummans
3W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.