Teams

SD 4.5 LJTC (3:1)/ Repetti

2024 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 4.5 WD

12 players · average NTRP 4.44 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-05vs SD 4.5 UCRC (2:2)/ DoyleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSophia Richardson / Kathleen Lacey vs Kellie Doyle / Kami Guerrier2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Repetti / Alison Hagopian vs Christina Bernstein / Erin Wall7-6, 7-6
2024-04-01vs SD 4.5 SDTRC (3:1)/ OttLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Repetti / Eva Bonelli vs Gretchen Shaffer / Carol Smith1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-29vs SD 4.5 UCRC (2:2)/ DoyleSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTerri Bourne vs Susan Lee6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNeda Mesri / Darlene Gallego vs Kellie Doyle / Christina Bernstein2-6, 1-6
2024-03-26vs SD LLW 4.5 Barnes TC/ LockLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Repetti / Alison Hagopian vs Katherine Steinberg / Jodi Doolittle4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Lacey vs Sheila Paguyo0-6, 0-6
2024-03-05vs SD 4.5 Balboa (3:1)/ PetteeWon 21
W#1 DoublesKellie Jaquez / Kathy Wong vs Patricia Matsuoka / Narelle Pettee6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Lacey / Adele Psyllos vs Janet McLees / Ruth Young6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesFiona Taylor / Neda Mesri vs Masako Beppu / Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-27vs SD LLW 4.5 Barnes TC/ LockWon 21
L#1 SinglesKathleen Lacey vs Beth Sharratt4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKellie Jaquez / Kathy Wong vs Dolores Ilko / Sheila Paguyo6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEva Bonelli / Alison Hagopian vs Tiffany Kellogg / Katherine Steinberg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-13vs SD 4.5 UCRC (2:2)/ FitzgeraldSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlison Hagopian vs Francesca Kornberg6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Repetti / Neda Mesri vs Jennifer Bjornstad / Erin Langs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-30vs SD 4.5 Balboa (3:1)/ PetteeWon 31
L#1 DoublesEva Bonelli / Carolynne Yen vs Elizabeth Jordan / Colleen Warren4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKathleen Lacey vs Yoko Anderson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Wong / Adele Psyllos vs Debbie Gerlack / Masako Beppu6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Harrison / Alison Hagopian vs Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie / Sandy Anderson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-01-16vs SD 4.5 SDTRC (3:1)/ OttWon 21
L#1 SinglesKathleen Lacey vs Sarina Lynn5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Repetti / Carolynne Yen vs Ashley Stone / Darci Pani4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSophia Richardson / Alison Hagopian vs Lora Moore / Sara Rosenthal5-3
2024-01-09vs SD 4.5 UCRC (2:2)/ FitzgeraldWon 40
W#1 DoublesKathy Wong / Carolynne Yen vs Tisha Carney / Jennifer Bjornstad6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathleen Lacey vs Christy Fritts3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Repetti / Gina Resch vs Francesca Kornberg / LUISA BAKAY6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacie Hunt / Alison Hagopian vs MinhTam Flynn / Rebecca Fritz6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 4.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kellie Jaquez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Alison Hagopian
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4.5
4.35
Carolynne Yen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Amy Repetti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Fiona Taylor
published
4.20
Kathleen Lacey
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.17
Adele Psyllos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
4.04
Eva Bonelli
published
3.97
Neda Mesri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.91
Stacie Hunt
published
3.81
Terri Bourne
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Richardson + Terri Bourne4649% games+10.5% vs expected
Neda Mesri + Fiona Taylor4161% games+8.3% vs expected
Amy Repetti + Alison Hagopian11655% games+2.4% vs expected
Kathleen Lacey + Alison Hagopian3448% gamesnot enough data
Carolynne Yen + Kellie Jaquez4255% gamesnot enough data
Carolynne Yen + Amy Repetti4160% gamesnot enough data
Sophia Richardson + Fiona Taylor3255% gamesnot enough data
Alison Hagopian + Kellie Jaquez5060% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kellie Jaquez
104W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Alison Hagopian
171W–74L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Carolynne Yen
115W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Amy Repetti
92W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
Fiona Taylor
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Kathleen Lacey
59W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Adele Psyllos
83W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Eva Bonelli
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Neda Mesri
96W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.97
Stacie Hunt
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
4
Terri Bourne
105W–136L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.