Teams

WC PURPLE

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAntoni Zarafonitis / Samuel Weigand vs John Dyer / Mark Folsom0-6, 1-6
2025-08-25vs CPV GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKiril Naoumov / Andrew Cheng vs Jeth Harbinson / Andrew Boutilier6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCharley Hoffmann vs Jamie Dreyer0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Hines / Kevin Fay vs Pete Rather / Brandon Short6-2, 6-2
2025-08-18vs RRTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Hines / Andrew Cheng vs Zaffrulla Dudikula / Elias Gebru3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKiril Naoumov vs Bruce Chiang6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Fay / Charley Hoffmann vs Garret DeCarlo / Maarten Warnaars1-6, 1-6
2025-08-11vs HRCA-S YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharley Hoffmann / Andrew Cheng vs Ankit Gaur / Noel Nieves1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSamuel Weigand vs Edwin Gomez1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Hines / Kevin Fay vs Spenser Johnston / Greg Todd1-6, 1-6
2025-08-04vs CCV REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesSamuel Weigand / Kiril Naoumov vs Gavin McCarty / Michael Frishman6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-07-28vs SH GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Hines / Samuel Weigand vs Travis Vap / Robert Schmela6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharley Hoffmann / Kiril Naoumov vs Jaime Beckley / Pete Comeau6-2, 6-3
2025-07-21vs PRKR PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesAlex Cheng / Michael Hines vs Michael Lampe / Jeff Smith4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAntoni Zarafonitis / Kevin Fay vs Anthony Guardian / David Mcdevitt3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Samuel Weigand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Kiril Naoumov
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Michael Hines
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Charley Hoffmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Antoni Zarafonitis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel Weigand + Michael Hines1449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Weigand
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Kiril Naoumov
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Michael Hines
8W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Charley Hoffmann
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Antoni Zarafonitis
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.