Teams

GTC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs GTC GREENLost 03
L#1 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs Michael Washer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBoyce Markham / Bryan Humphrys vs Philip Timberlake / Kenneth Kinderwater3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Nobles / Connor Velvin vs Glenn Tacke / Jonathan Liauw4-6, 2-6
2023-05-25vs GPTC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJason Wang / Chris Donald vs Josh Lozow / Sean OConnor4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs Amador Jimenez6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Richards / Stephen Howlett vs David Guy / Dylan Pearson3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMichael Nobles vs Andres Seijas7-6
2023-05-24vs APR-U GREENWon 50
W#1 DoublesChris Donald / Jason Wang vs William Mahaffy / Bruce Eldredge6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs John Cordova6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBoyce Markham / Kyle Koontz vs Eric Mayer / Richard Abernethy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Nobles vs Kenneth Moyer7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBryan Humphrys / David Richards vs Mark Kruk / Jack Kirtland6-4, 6-4
2023-05-23vs SKY SILVERWon 50
W#1 DoublesJames Parker / Michael Nobles vs Chad Murray / David Bacon6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs Paul Krueger6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKyle Koontz / Chris Donald vs Chris Burckhardt / Scott Tobias6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesConnor Velvin vs Matt Moon6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Howlett / David Richards vs Neal OConnor / John Barker6-1, 6-3
2023-05-03vs CACM GREYLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / Jason Wang vs Daniel Friesen / Thomas Tsai6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs Dirk McDermott3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyle Koontz / Chris Donald vs Brian Berglund / Brian Wylie3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesConnor Velvin vs Henry Weaver6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Humphrys / David Richards vs Tom Weaver / Stephen Clarke3-6, 2-6
2023-04-26vs CM MAROONWon 31
L#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / Boyce Markham vs Brent Slosky / Clay Schneiter3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesConnor Velvin vs Jeff Robert6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Parker / Stephen Howlett vs Tom Brown / Adam Barkin1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs James Manassee6-0, 6-2
2023-04-19vs CACM BLUEWon 41
W#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / Boyce Markham vs Daniel Chin / BRIAN ROSENTHAL6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesConnor Velvin vs Jonathan Bach6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Donald / James Parker vs Erik Graver / Ali Barghelame6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJason Wang vs Robert Scofield2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Howlett / Kyle Koontz vs Randal Ankeney / Jeff Kinzler6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Raghav Mathur
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Bryan Humphrys
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Connor Velvin
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.71
Michael Nobles
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.58
Jason Wang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.44
Chris Donald
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.38
Boyce Markham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.24
David Richards
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
David Ehrlich
published
Kyle Koontz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Stephen Howlett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Wang + Michael Nobles4350% games−5.0% vs expected
David Richards + Jason Wang3251% gamesnot enough data
David Richards + Stephen Howlett134 matchesnot enough data
Boyce Markham + Jason Wang134 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Koontz + Bryan Humphrys134 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Koontz + Michael Nobles134 matchesnot enough data
David Ehrlich + Chris Donald213 matchesnot enough data
Jason Wang + Chris Donald123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raghav Mathur
19W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Bryan Humphrys
5W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Connor Velvin
5W–5L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Michael Nobles
69W–78L career · 7 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Jason Wang
33W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Chris Donald
22W–53L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.44
4
Boyce Markham
26W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
3.5
David Richards
17W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
David Ehrlich
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Koontz
11W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Howlett
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.