Teams

King 18s 3.0M Singles Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 3.0 Men Singles Wed

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesWilliam Craft vs Trevor Gilbert6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesIke Nwosu vs Jose Lopez1-6, 5-7
2026-08-03vs Mendoza 18s 3.0M Singles Wed PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Charles Stowers6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJack Royals vs MIKAEL SCHILL6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPablo Araya vs Mike Turbeville6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJack Royals vs Brayan Ramos6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesWilliam Craft vs Jose Lopez6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTy Grogan vs Trevor Gilbert1-6
2026-07-01vs Mendoza 18s 3.0M Singles Wed PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesPablo Araya vs Charles Stowers6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesIke Nwosu vs Mike Turbeville6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Brayan Ramos6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPablo Araya vs Trevor Gilbert2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSean Jones vs Jose Lopez6-4, 6-1
2026-06-10vs Mendoza 18s 3.0M Singles Wed PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesTy Grogan vs Charles Stowers2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPablo Araya vs Rod Mendoza7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJack Royals vs Donald O'Brien6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Eric Morris6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesWilliam Craft vs Adrian Wezgowiec1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesIke Nwosu vs Trevor Gilbert4-6, 3-6
2026-05-20vs Mendoza 18s 3.0M Singles Wed PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesJack Royals vs Mike Turbeville6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBRIAN KING vs Charles Stowers3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesPablo Araya vs MIKAEL SCHILL6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Singles Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Jack Royals
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.96
William Craft
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.89
Jackson Honeycutt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Pablo Araya
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.88
BRIAN KING
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.74
Sean Jones
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.67
Ty Grogan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.45
Ike Nwosu
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Tre Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

BRIAN KING + Jack Royals314 matchesnot enough data
Jackson Honeycutt + Jack Royals213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Royals
25W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
William Craft
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96
Jackson Honeycutt
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Pablo Araya
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
BRIAN KING
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Sean Jones
15W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Ty Grogan
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
Ike Nwosu
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Tre Smith
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.