Teams

16 WOCC Hamlin single ladies

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-04vs 14 Bon Air RhodesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSamantha Otero vs Emily Larson3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBlair McDuff vs Greta Satterfield6-2, 6-1
2025-10-28vs 17 CCV PeanutsLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmy Broderick vs Caroline Turner2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKristin Hamlin vs Genevieve McGroarty0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSamantha Otero vs Elizabeth Crowley0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-07vs 11 Westwood DiMeglioLost 03
L#1 SinglesAmy Broderick vs Christie Wisotzki1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBlair McDuff vs Catherine Stanley5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSarah Gray vs Carleen DiMeglio4-6, 6-7
2025-10-04vs 18 Southampton Roper 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesAmy Voelzke vs Virginia Loftin3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesFrancesca Purcell vs Sarah Powers6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAlexis Vincent vs Kim Case6-0, 6-1
2025-09-23vs 8 Belmont - NelsonWon 21
L#1 SinglesAlexis Vincent vs Erin Sheridan2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKaty Knierim vs Jana Chesley6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesNikki Powell vs Naomi Nelson7-5, 6-4
2025-09-16vs 6 SCC McClenny Smash PotatoesWon 21
L#1 SinglesKristin Hamlin vs Sally Hurt3-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKaty Knierim vs Morgan Vargo6-4, 5-4
W#3 SinglesFrancesca Purcell vs Aimee Collins4-6, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Alexis Vincent
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.94
Samantha Otero
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.90
Blair McDuff
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Kristin Hamlin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.81
Francesca Purcell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.80
Katy Knierim
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Amy Voelzke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.74
Amy Broderick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Nikki Powell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Gray
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katy Knierim + Blair McDuff4160% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexis Vincent
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Samantha Otero
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Blair McDuff
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kristin Hamlin
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Francesca Purcell
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Katy Knierim
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Amy Voelzke
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Amy Broderick
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Nikki Powell
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Gray
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.